The Rays swapped out their old FieldTurf and replaced it with Shaw Sports Turf. While most have been focused on how it looks and how it will affect the ball, it turns out there is another unforseen impact: the stadium just looks brighter with the new turf.

Obviously, part of the issue is the absence of the dark patches, which gave the old turf its “watermelon” appearance. But also, the light patches just seem to reflect light more.

While we have to take photos from different cameras with a small grain of salt, here is the difference between the new turf (top) and the old turf (bottom) from Associated Press photographers. Also note, the bottom photo is not opening day, but rather just a random game in June.

The new turf is so bright the ESPN announcers thought that the Rays had added lights.

“I thought they added some lights,” one ESPN announcer said during the broadcast. “I mean, it really became brighter than I feel like it has ever been.”

Again, it is hard to say if the setting on the cameras differed, but here is the view of the field on opening day last year compared to this season as seen on the Sun Sports cameras. That’s quite a difference.



  1. Mike says:

    Some how, the turf from the inaugural season looked better that that terrible FieldTurf.

  2. Rick says:

    I recall in 2011 the last time we updated the field, it looked pretty good, but over the years, it started to darken/miscolor. They do a lot of concerts, trade shows, football, etc during the off season and during the season and doubt that helps keep the field its original shade of green.


Leave a Comment